CONSIDERATION OF SIGNIFICANT FACTORS AND LIMITATIONS IN THE STUDY AND DEVELOPMENT OF PASSIVELY RESERVED AIRCRAFT SUBSYSTEMS, TAKING INTO ACCOUNT TOLERANCES

Objectives. The relevance of this article lies in the fact that the problem of increasing the reliability of subsystems of aviation and rocket and space technology in case of sudden independent refusals determines one of the important areas of scientific research. The work is aimed at identifying and analyzing specific features that must be considered when researching and developing passively redundant subsystems, taking into account tolerances in case of sudden independent failures.

Method. During the study, calculations were carried out using the methods of probability, search. The necessity of taking into account assigned and implemented tolerances, multiple and non-multiple reservation, discrete scales of realizable tolerances with different levels of significance, critical probabilities, determining the probability ranges of elements, where redundancy is profitable and unprofitable, is shown.

Result. The possibility of implementing any tolerance for different values of a number of increasing individual multiplicities is revealed, which allows for a given tolerance to pose the task of finding the optimal multiplicity and its corresponding optimal backup structure in the interests of ensuring maximum reliability of the redundant subsystems. Analysis of the presented dependencies for the implemented tolerances of the first and second levels shows that for each tolerance level there are equilibrium values ???????????? at which the critical values of p_kr practically do not change depending on the multiplicities ????????.

Conclusion. A different nature of the change in the critical probabilities ???????????? was found depending on the multiplicities for different values of the tolerances to be realized. So, with tolerances of the first level, larger than 25%, with increasing multiplicity, p_kr increases and smaller than 25% decreases with increasing multiplicity. The similar nature of the change in the p_kr values has a 28.6% tolerance for the implemented second-level tolerances.

1. Gerasimova D.S., Palukhin A.A. Rezervirovaniye elementov kak sposob povysheniya nadezhnosti sistemy pozharotusheniya samoleta TU-204. Reshetnevskiye chteniya, 2017, 21(1), 431-433. [Gerasimova, D.S., Palukhin, A.A. Reservation of elements as a way to improve the reliability of the fire extinguishing system of the TU-204. Reshetnev Readings, 2017, 21(1), 431-433. (In Russ)]

2. Antseliovich L.L. Nadezhnost', bezotkaznost' i zhivuchest' samoleta. Moskva: Mashinostroyeniye, 1985 [Anceliovich, L.L. Reliability, reliability and survivability of the aircraft. Moscow: Mashinostroyeniye, 1985. (In Russ)]

3. Dedkov V.K., Tatuyev A.I. Obespecheniye nadezhnosti tekhnicheskikh ob"yektov po stadiyam ikh zhiznennogo tsikla. Moskva: Mashinostroyeniye Polet, 2010. [Dedkov V.K., Tatuyev, A.I. Ensuring the reliability of technical objects in stages of their life cycle. Moscow: MashinostroyeniyePolet, 2010. (In Russ)]

4. Red'ko P.G. Povysheniye bezotkaznosti i uluchsheniye kharakteristik elektrogidravlicheskikh sledya-shchikh privodov. Moskva: Izdatel'skiy tsentr MGTU “Stankin”, 2002 [Redko P.G. Improving reliability and improving the characteristics of electro-hydraulic servo drives. Moscow: Publishing Center MSTU “Stankin”, 2002. (In Russ)]

5. Yepifanov A.D. Nadezhnost' sistem upravleniya. Moskva: Mashinostroyeniye, 1975. [Epifanov A.D. Reliability of control systems. Moscow: Mashinostroyeniye, 1975. (In Russ)]

6. Grishin V.M., P'o Maung Ko. Optimizatsiya bezotkaznosti sistem upravleniya LA pri aktivnom nagruzhennom rezervirovanii. Vestnik MAI, 2009, 16(5), 52-59. [Grishin V.M., Pyo, Maung Ko. Optimization of the reliability of aircraft control systems with active load redundancy. Vestnik MAI, 2009, 16(5), 52-59. (In Russ)]

7. Bessonov A.A., Moroz A.V. Nadezhnost' sistem avtomaticheskogo regulirovaniya. Leningrad: Energoatomizdat, 1984. [Bessonov A.A., Moroz, A.V. Reliability of automatic control systems. Leningrad: Energoatomizdat, 1984. (In Russ)]

8. Milokhin YU.M., Berson A.YU., Kavitskaya V.K., Yerenburg E.I. Nadezhnost' raketnykh dvigateley na tverdom toplive. Moskva: OOO Evrika, 2005. [Milekhi Yu.M., Berson, A.Yu., Kavitskaya, V.K., Erenburg, E.I. Reliability of solid-fuel rocket engines. Moscow: LLC Evrika, 2005. (In Russ)]

9. Polovko A.M., Gurov S.I. Osnovy teorii nadezhnosti. Sankt-Peterburg: BKHV Peterburg, 2006. [Polovko A.M., Gurov, S.I. Fundamentals of the theory of reliability. Saint Petersburg: BKHV Peterburg, 2006, p. 247. (In Russ)]

10. Cherkasova N.G., Krylova O.K. Povysheniye effektivnosti ochistki vybrosov elektroliznogo proiz-vodstva vnedreniyem gorelochnogo ustroystva pri konstruirovanii letatel'nykh apparatov. Reshetnev-skiye chteniya, 2017, 21(2), 121-122. [Cherkasova N.G., Krylova, О.K. Improving the efficiency of cleaning emissions of electrolysis production by the introduction of a burner device in the design of aircraft. Reshetnev Readings, 2017, 21(2), 121-122. (In Russ)]