Algorithms for Modules Implementing Amplitude Impulse Modulation
https://doi.org/10.21822/2073-6185-2025-52-3-29-37
Abstract
Objective. The aim of the study is to develop algorithms and approaches for effective synthesis of controllers in automated control systems (ACS) that utilize amplitude impulse modulation (AIM), as well as address the shortcomings of classical synthesis methods caused by the lack of a unified methodology for designing systems with nonlinear characteristics.
Method. The research relies on the generalized Galerkin method and polynomial approximation techniques to create mathematical models of different types of impulse modulators, including ideal impulse elements (IIEs), first-order amplitude-impulse modulators (AIM-I), and second-order amplitude-impulse modulators (AIM-II). These models allow for more accurate representation of real-world conditions in ACS operation and minimize the impact of traditional synthesis limitations in control theory.
Result. Algorithms have been developed for converting continuous signals into discrete forms that demonstrate high conformity with expectations and required technical specifications.
Conclusion. The proposed approach has been validated through computer simulations, confirming its effectiveness, and simulation results are presented.
Keywords
About the Authors
N. L. GrechkinRussian Federation
Nikita L. Grechkin - Senior lecturer, Department Control in Technical System».
67 Bolshaya Morskaia Str., Saint-Petersburg 190000
E. Yu. Vataeva
Russian Federation
Elizaveta Yu.Vataeva - Cand.Sci.(Eng.), Assoc. Prof., Department Control in Technical Systems.
67 Bolshaya Morskaia Str., Saint-Petersburg 190000
References
1. Natalia Bakhtadze, Alexander Suleykin, Industrial digital ecosystems: Predictive models and architecture development issues, Annual Reviews in Control, 2021;51:56–64. ISSN1367-5788. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arcontrol.2020.11.001
2. Furtat I.B., P.A. Gushchin, Nguyen Ba Hu, “Control of dynamic systems with constraints on input and output signals”, Autom. and Telemech., 2023; 4:45–63; Autom. Remote Control, 2023; 84 (4):397–411. DOI: https://doi.org/10.25728/arcRAS.2023.96.64.001
3. Kruk, A.E. Synthesis of nonlinear pulse control systems under random influences. A.E. Kruk, L.A. Osipov. Information and control systems. 2012;3 (58):33-36. (In Russ)
4. Gaiduk Anatoly Romanovich, Kapustyan Sergey Grigorievich, Almashal Mohammad Jalal Comparison of methods for synthesis of nonlinear control systems. Bulletin of ISEU. 2021;6. URL: https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/sravnenie-metodov-sinteza-nelineynyh-sistem-upravleniya (access date: 06/11/2025). (In Russ)
5. Pyrkin A.A., Kolyubin S.A., Bobtsov A.A. Simple output controller for nonlinear systems with multisinusoidal disturbance. 21st Mediterranean Conference on Control and Automation, MED 2013, Conference Proceedings, 2013:1087-1091
6. Jingjing Gao, Xiangpeng Xie, A weighted switching sequence optimization algorithm for static output feedback control synthesis of nonlinear systems. Applied Mathematics and Computation, 2025; 489,:129152, ISSN 0096-3003, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amc.2024.129152
7. Wang L., Ortega R., Bobtsov A. Observability is sufficient for the design of globally exponentially stable state observers for state-affine nonlinear systems. Automatica, 2023;149:11083.
8. Lai Wei, Ryan McCloy, Jie Bao, Control Contraction Metric Synthesis for Discrete-time Nonlinear Systems, IFAC-PapersOnLine, 2021;54(3):661-666. https:doi.org/10.1016/j.ifacol.2021.08.317ISSN2405-8963
9. Wen-Chao HUANG, Hong-Fei SUN, Jian-Ping ZENG, Robust Control Synthesis of Polynomial Nonlinear Systems Using Sum of Squares Technique, Acta Automatica Sinica. 2013;39(6):799-805, ISSN 1874-1029, https://doi.org/10.1016/S1874-1029(13)60055-5
10. Bobtsov A.A., Nikolaev N.A., Kozachok O.A., Oskina O.V. Adaptive observer of state variables of a nonlinear nonstationary system with unknown constant parameters and delay in the measurement channel. Scientific and Technical Bulletin of Information Technologies, Mechanics and Optics. 2023; 23(4): 850–853. doi: 10.17586/2226-1494-2023-23-4-850-853 (In Russ)
11. Anosov V.N., Kaveshnikov V.M., Saidov S.A. Synthesis of a neural power controller in a sensorless traction electric drive system. Omsk Scientific Bulletin. 2021; 2 (176): 31–35. DOI: 10.25206/1813-8225-2021-176-31-35. (In Russ)
12. Bernal Miguel, Sala Antonio, Lendek Zsofia, Guerra Thierry-Marie. Analysis and Synthesis of Nonlinear Control Systems: A Convex Optimization Approach. 2022. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-90773-0
13. Lovchikov, A.N. Analysis and synthesis of pulse-width systems. A.N. Lovchikov, E.E. Noskova. Bulletin of the Siberian State Aerospace University named after Academician M.F. Reshetnev. 2010;4(30):57-61. (In Russ)
14. Aitchanov, B.Kh. Structural synthesis of pulse-frequency control systems with delay. Proceedings of the University. 2003; 4: 40-43. (In Russ)
15. Nikitin A.V., Shishlakov V.F. Parametric synthesis of nonlinear automatic control systems: monograph. SPb: SPbGUAP., 2003:358. (In Russ)
16. Vataeva, E.Yu. Parametric synthesis of a low-power potentiometric tracking system. Proceedings of MAI. 2024;134. (In Russ)
17. Vataeva, E.Yu. Parametric synthesis of a low-power potentiometric tracking system with a pulse element. Information, measuring and control systems. 2023; 21( 4):51-57. (In Russ)
Review
For citations:
Grechkin N.L., Vataeva E.Yu. Algorithms for Modules Implementing Amplitude Impulse Modulation. Herald of Dagestan State Technical University. Technical Sciences. 2025;52(3):29-37. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.21822/2073-6185-2025-52-3-29-37































