RELEVANT DIRECTIONS FOR THE PRODUCTION OF COMPETITIVE CONSTRUCTION PRODUCTS ON THE BASIS OF INNOVATION
https://doi.org/10.21822/2073-6185-2017-44-2-197-209
Abstract
Objectives. The article substantiates the necessity for competitive innovative high-tech construction products at the present stage of modernisation of the construction industry and reveals some peculiarities of their manufacture.
Methods. In the course of the research, a programme-targeted method was applied, underlying the development of a programme for the innovative development of construction production.
Results. Relevant directions of innovative development of construction production are systematised. The world's application experience of a technical regulation parametric model for construction industry product manufacturing is generalised. In order to increase the level of innovative activity of construction organisations, a set of practical measures is proposed whose implementation will ensure the output of competitive building products to the market.
Conclusion. Increasing the competitiveness of construction products is closely connected with the activation of innovative processes: the introduction of high technology (including resource-saving) into production processes and the expansion of the output of innovative products with the best consumer properties capable of successfully competing on the market with foreign counterparts in the context of import substitution strategies. The modernisation of the construction industry on the basis of introduction of hightech production methods specifies new requirements to the professional competencies of personnel producing competitive building products. To solve the set problems, a tool for improving the management mechanism of the innovative activity of construction organisations was proposed, ensuring the integration of institutional and production conditions for the large-scale development of advanced technologies and production of science-intensive types of construction products.
About the Author
T. Yu. Levitskiy
Daghestan State Technical University
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Graduate student,
70 I. Shamilya Ave., Makhachkala 367026
References
1. Strategiya razvitiya promyshlennosti stroitel'nykh materialov na period do 2020 goda i dal'neyshuyu perspektivu do 2030 goda. Rasporyazhenie pravitel'stva Rossiyskoy Federatsii ot 10 maya 2016 g. № 868-r, Moskva. [Development strategy of building materials industry until 2020 and further perspective until 2030. Directive of RF Government from 10.05.2016. № 868-r, Moscow. (in Russ.)]
2. Stroitel'stvo v Rossii. 2016: Statisticheskiy sbornik. Moskva: Rosstat; S.111. [Building in Russia. 2016: Statistical collection. Moscow: Rosstat; P.111. (in Russ.)]
3. Rossiya v tsifrakh - 2017. Rossiyskiy statisticheskiy ezhegodnik. Ofitsial'noe izdanie [Elektronnyy resurs]. Rezhim dostupa: www.infostat.ru. [Russia in numbers - 2017. Statistical yearbook of Russia.Official publication [Electronic resourse]. Free access: www.infostat.ru. (in Russ.)]
4. Antipov Yu. Innovatsionnaya deyatel'nost' kak faktor konkurentosposobnosti firmy. Marketing i marketingovye issledovaniya. 2009;3(89):212-221. [Antipov Yu. Innovative activity as a factor of firm‘s competitiveness. Marketing i marketingovye issledovaniya. 2009;3(89):212-221. (in Russ.)]
5. Levitskiy T.Yu., Esetova A.M. Innovatsionnyy potentsial kak opredelyayushchiy faktor rosta konkurentnykh preimushchestv stroitel'noy produktsii. Vestnik Dagestanskogo gosudarstvennogo tekhnicheskogo universiteta. Tekhnicheskie nauki. 2014;34(3):121-128. DOI:10.21822/2073-6185-2014-34-3- 121-128. [Levitskiy T.Yu., Esetova A.M. Innivative potential as determinant growth factor of competitive advantages of building products. Herald of Daghestan State Technical University. Technical Sciences. 2014;34(3):121-128. DOI:10.21822/2073-6185-2014-34-3-121-128. (in Russ.)]
6. Volchkov A.N. Innovatsionnaya aktivnost' firmy na osnove primeneniya mekhanizma vosproizvodstva i obnovleniya osnovnykh fondov - strategicheskiy resurs sokhraneniya konkurentosposobnosti i ekonomicheskogo rosta. Spravochnik. Inzhenernyy zhurnal. 2007;4:41-46. [Volchkov A.N. Firm‘s innovative activity based on application of reproduction and fixed assets renewal mechanisms is a strategic resourse of retention of competitiveness and economic growth. Reference book. Engineering Magazine. 2007;4:41-46. (in Russ.)]
7. Voronov A.A. Modelirovanie konkurentosposobnosti produktsii. Standarty i kachestvo. 2004;11:44-47. [Voronov A.A. Modeling of product‘s competitiveness. Standards and Quality. 2004;11:44-47. (in Russ.)]
8. Demchenko A.O. Rol' tekhnologicheskikh innovatsiy v strategii razvitiya predpriyatiya. Izvestiya Sankt-Peterburgskogo universiteta ekonomiki i finansov. 2010;2:93-96. [Demchenko A.O. The importance of technological innovations in the strategy of enterprise‘s development. Izvestiya SanktPeterburgskogo universiteta ekonomiki i finansov. 2010;2:93-96. (in Russ.)]
9. Kabakova E.V. Vzaimosvyaz' konkurentsii i innovatsionnoy deyatel'nosti. Izvestiya Orenburgskogo gosudarstvennogo agrarnogo universiteta. 2006;4(12-1):108-111. [Kabakova E.V. Competitiveness and innovative activity interrelation. Izvestiya Orenburgskogo gosudarstvennogo agrarnogo universiteta. 2006;4(12-1):108-111. (in Russ.)]
10. Lebedeva N.N. Innovatsionnaya aktivnost' predpriyatiy kak uslovie ikh konkurentosposobnosti. Journal of Institutional Studies. 2010;2(4):15-21. [Lebedeva N.N. Innovative activity of enterprises acting as their competitiveness condition. Journal of Institutional Studies. 2010;2(4):15-21. (in Russ.)]
11. Napkhonenko N.V. Kommertsializatsiya tekhnologiy i konkurentosposobnost' otechestvennykh predpriyatiy. Izvestiya vysshikh uchebnykh zavedeniy. Severo-Kavkazskiy region. Tekhnicheskie nauki. 2007;5:105-107. [Napkhonenko N.V. Commercialisation of technologies and competitiveness of national enterprises. Izvestiya vysshikh uchebnykh zavedeniy. Severo-Kavkazskiy region. Tekhnicheskie nauki. 2007;5:105-107. (in Russ.)]
12. Shevchenko I. V. Problemy povysheniya konkurentosposobnosti predpriyatiy s pozitsii mirovogo opyta. Finansy i kredit. 2004;10:6-10. [Shevchenko I. V. Problems of enterprise competitiveness elevation from the perspective of world‘s experience. Finance and credit. 2004;10:6-10. (in Russ.)]
13. Aleksandrova E.N., Shevchenko K.I. Innovatsionnyy faktor konkurentnogo pozitsionirovaniya natsional'noy ekonomiki v sisteme mirokhozyaystvennykh svyazey: vyvody mezhdunarodnykh sopostavleniy. Nats. interesy: prioritety i bezopasnost'. 2011;2:14-20. [Aleksandrova E.N., Shevchenko K.I. Innovative factor of national economics competitive positioning in a system of micro-economic relations: international comparison results. National interests: priorities and security. 2011;2:14-20. (in Russ.)]
14. Alekseeva M.S., Tikhonova M.V. Adaptatsionnyy mekhanizm kak vid organizatsionnoekonomicheskogo mekhanizma dlya razvitiya i povysheniya konkurentosposobnosti promyshlennykh predpriyatiy. Vestnik Sankt-Peterburgskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta tekhnologii i dizayna. Ser. 3. Ekonomicheskie, gumanitarnye i obshchestvennye nauki. 2016;2:18-22. [Alekseeva M.S., Tikhonova M.V. Adaptive mechanism as a type of organisation-economic mechamism for the industrial enterprise development and competitiveness elevation. Vestnik of St. Petersburg State University of Technology and Design. Series 3. Economic, humanitarian and social sciences. 2016;2:18-22. (in Russ.)]
15. Berezin A.A. Vliyanie strategiy izderzhek na konkurentosposobnost' kompanii. Mikroekonomika. 2012;5:47-50. [Berezin A.A. Strategic expenses impact on company‘s competitiveness. Microeconomics. 2012;5:47-50. (in Russ.)]
16. Kara A. Otsenka konkurentosposobnosti spetsialistov na osnove kompleksnoy sistemy pokazateley. Problemy teorii i praktiki upravleniya. 2011;7:36-44. [Kara A. Competitiveness evaluation of professionals based on complex indicator system. Theoretical and Practical Aspects of Management. 2011;7:36-44. (in Russ.)]
17. Klekovkin L.I. Sistemnyy podkhod k ponimaniyu konkurentosposobnosti kak faktor ustoychivogo razvitiya ekonomiki. Nats. interesy: prioritety i bezopasnost'. 2010;17:32-38. [Klekovkin L.I. System approach to understanding the competitiveness as a factor of sustainable economic development. National interests: priorities and security. 2010;17:32-38. (in Russ.)]
18. Popov S. Konkurentosposobnaya strategiya na osnove kornevykh kompetentsiy. Ekonomicheskie strategii. 2010;11:70-79. [Popov S. Competitive strategy based on root competencies. Economic Strategies. 2010;11:70-79. (in Russ.)]
19. Taranukha Yu.V. O kategorii "konkurentosposobnost'". Vestnik Moskovskogo universiteta. Ser. 6. Ekonomika. 2013;3:3-17. [Taranukha Yu.V. About the ―competitiveness‖ category. Moscow University Economics Bulletin. Series 6. Economics. 2013;3:3-17. (in Russ.)]
20. Kheyfets B.A. Importozameshchenie i konkurentosposobnost'. Rossiya i sovremennyy mir. 2016;2:6- 21. [Kheyfets B.A. Import substitution and competitiveness. Russia and the Contemporary World. 2016;2:6-21. (in Russ.)]
21. Tsement P.E., Aleshchenko V.V. Konkurentosposobnost' stroitel'noy otrasli. ECO. 2011;8:167-182. [Tsement P.E., Aleshchenko V.V. Competitiveness in building industry. ECO. 2011;8:167-182. (in Russ.)]
22. Chernikov A.V., Red'ko V.A. Sovremennye innovatsionnye instrumenty povysheniya konkurentosposobnosti kompanii. Vestnik Moskovskogo universiteta. Ser. 6. Ekonomika. 2011;5:41-62. [Chernikov A.V., Red'ko V.A. Contemporary innovative instruments of raising company‘s competitiveness. Moscow University Economics Bulletin. Series 6. Economics. 2011;5:41-62. (in Russ.)]
23. Konina N.Yu. Konkurentosposobnost' firmy v global'nom mire. Moskva: Prospekt; 2012. 368 s. [Konina N.Yu. Firm‘s competitiveness in a global world. Moscow: Prospekt; 2012. 368 p. (in Russ.)]
24. Özorhon B., Arditi D., Dikmen I., Birgönül M.T. The performance of international joint ventures in construction. Journal of Management in Engineering. 2010;26(4):209-222.
25. Günhan S., Arditi D. International expansion decision for construction companies. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management. 2005;131(8):928-937.
26. Ofori G. Frameworks for analyzing international construction. Construction Management and Economics. 2003;21(4):379-391.
27. Günhan S., Arditi D. Factors affecting international construction. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management. 2005;131(3):273-282.
28. Korkmaz S. and Messner J. I. Competitive Positioning and Continuity of Construction Firms in International Markets. Journal of Management in Engineering. 2008;24(4):207-216.
29. SN 509-78 Instruktsiya po opredeleniyu ekonomicheskoy effektivnosti ispol'zovaniya v stroitel'stve novoy tekhniki, izobreteniy i ratsionalizatorskikh predlozheniy. Rezhim dostupa - http://docs.cntd.ru/document/901708998 [SN 509-78 Instruction for determining the economic efficiency of use in the construction of new equipment, inventions and rationalization proposals. Access mode - http://docs.cntd.ru/document/901708998 (in Russ.)]
30. O tekhnicheskom regulirovanii. Feder. Zakon №184 ot 27.12.2009. Rossiyskaya gazeta. 2009. [About technical regulation. Federal law №184 from 27.12.2009. Rossiyskaya gazeta. 2009. (in Russ.)]
31. Yanin O.E. Problemy regulirovaniya innovatsionnoy aktivnosti predpriyatiy na osnove programmno - tselevykh metodov. Promyshlennaya politika v Rossiyskoy federatsii. 2011;10:45. [Yanin O.E. Problems of regulation of enterprise innovative activity based on programme-goal methods. Promyshlennaya politika v Rossiyskoy federatsii. 2011;10:45. (in Russ.)]
Review
For citations:
Levitskiy T.Yu. RELEVANT DIRECTIONS FOR THE PRODUCTION OF COMPETITIVE CONSTRUCTION PRODUCTS ON THE BASIS OF INNOVATION. Herald of Dagestan State Technical University. Technical Sciences. 2017;44(2):197-209. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.21822/2073-6185-2017-44-2-197-209
Views:
827
Email this article 
