ENERGY AND CONSTRUCTION CONDITIONS OF THE EFFECTIVENESS OF APPAATUS FOR GENERAL CRYOTHERAPEUTIC IMPACT
https://doi.org/10.21822/2073-6185-2016-43-4-25-33
Abstract
Objectives. To evaluate the correspondence of construction and power consumption of Cryotherapeutic Complexes (CTC) with technological conditions of effectiveness of the General Cryotherapeutic Impact (GCI). Methods. The associated analysis method used Cryotherapeutic Complexes (CTC) construction and power consumption with technological conditions of effectiveness of the General Cryotherapeutic Impact (GCI). Results. An explanation for the discrepancy of observations of different researchers in differences in design and available power of the CTC is proposed. The technical operating characteristics of single-seat and multi-seat CTC are provided and these significant differences in apparatus of identical technological designation are illustrated. The proposed system of specific CTC characteristics is capable of unifying their basic structural and energy characteristics. Calculation of the specific characteristics of existing systems showed that between objects of the same designation, there are differences in value, which may be the cause of discrepancies in their therapeutic efficacy. All functional CPC have a cryostatting cooling capacity system deficit of between 8 and 75%. In multi-seat CPC cooling capacity deficit exceeds 50%, which excludes the possibility of obtaining a significant therapeutic effect, as is confirmed by the results of independent studies that show that the procedures in multi-seat CTC safeguards skin from frigorism only up to 14°C, while at the same time for effective OKV frigorism of the skin surface is necessary to a temperature of less than about 2°C. Prior to research on the effectiveness of OKV, it is necessary to assess the energy consumption conformity of cryotherapy equipment. Conclusion. For the successful implementation of OKV in medicine and sport, it is necessary to increase energy efficiency and optimise cryotherapeutic temperature control settings. A cryotheraputic complex should safeguard such physical conditions in such a way that the body surface is frigerised to a temperature of less than about 2°C. The cryostatting patient cabin system cooling capacity should provide heat removal from the surface of the patient's skin with an intensity of no lower than 3.35 kW/m2. For intensive heat removal from the patient's body surface the cooling gas temperature must not exceed -130ºC.
About the Authors
A. U. BaranovRussian Federation
Alexander U.Baranov – Dr. Sc. (Technical), Prof., Assoc.Prof.
49 Kronverkskiy Ave., St. Petersburg 197101, Russia
A. A. Osinа
Russian Federation
Anastasia A. Osinа – Undergraduate.
49 Kronverkskiy Ave., St. Petersburg 197101, Russia
V. A. Sinkova
Russian Federation
Valentina A. Sinkova – Undergraduate.
49 Kronverkskiy Ave., St. Petersburg 197101, Russia
References
1. Savic M., Fonda B., Sarabon N. Actual temperature during and thermal response after whole-body cryotherapy in cryo-cabin. Journal of Thermal Biology. 2013;38:186–191.
2. Baranov A.Yu., Malysheva T.A. Eksperimentalnaya proverka rezultatov izmereniya teperatury poverkhnosti kozhnogo pokrova patsienta do i posle obshchego krioterapevticheskogo vozdeystviya. Lechebnaya fizkultura i sportivnaya meditsina. 2016;4(136):40-46. [Baranov A.Yu., Malysheva T.A. Experimental verification of patients‘ skin-surface temperature measurements before and after whole body cryotherapy. Exercise Therapy and Sports Medicine. 2016;4(136):40-46. (In Russ.)]
3. Vieira A., Bottaro M., Ferreira-Junior J., Vieira C., Cleto V., Cadore E. et al. Does whole-body cryotherapy improve vertical jump recovery following a high-intensity exercise bout? Open Access Journal of Sports Medicine. 2015. 49–54.
4. Costello J.T., Donnelly A.E., Karki A., Selfe J. Effects of whole body cryotherapy and cold water immersion on knee skin temperature. International Journal of Sports Medicine. 2014. 35–40.
5. Hausswirth C., Schaal K., Le Meur Y., Bieuzen F., Filliard J-R., Volondat M. et al. Parasympathetic activity and blood catecholamine responses following a single partial-body cry-ostimulation and a whole-body cryostimulation. PLoS ONE. 2013 Aug 22;8(8):e72658.
6. Bleakley C.M., Bieuzen F., Davison G.W., Costello J.T. Whole-body cryotherapy: empirical evidence and theoretical perspectives. Open Access Journal of Sports Medicine. 2014. 25–36.
7. Cholewka A., Stanek A., Sieroń A., Drzazga Z. Thermography study of skin response due to whole-body cryotherapy. Skin Research and Technology. 2012. 180–187.
8. Baranov A.Yu., Baranov V.A., Malysheva T.A. Energeticheskie osnovy effektivnosti krioterapevticheskoy apparatury. Fizioterapiya, balneologiya i reabilitatsiya. 2005;2:29-31. [Baranov A.Yu., Baranov V.A., Malysheva T.A. Energetic basis of efficiency of cryotherapeutic equipment. Russian journal of phhysiotherapy, balneology and rehabilitation 2005;2:29-31. (In Russ.)].
9. Miller E., Mrowicka M., Malinowska K., Mrowicki J., Saluk-Juszczak J. et al. Effects of whole-body cryotherapy on a total antioxidative status and activities of antioxidative enzymes in blood of depressive multiple sclerosis patients. The World Journal of Biological Psychiatry. 2011;12:223-227.
10. Pournot H., Bieuzen F., Louis J., Mounier R., Fillard J.R. et al. Time-course of changes in inflammatory response after whole-body cryotherapy multi exposures following severe exercise. PLOS ONE. 2011;6:e22748. DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0022748. PubMed: 21829501.
11. Lubkowska A., Szyguła Z. Changes in blood pressure with compensatory heart rate decrease and in the level of aerobic capacity in response to repeated whole-body cryostimulation in normotensive, young and physically active men. International Journal of Occupational Medicine and Environmental Health. 2010;23:367-375. PubMed: 21306982.
12. Makhanyok A.A., Levin M.L., Dragun V.L. Teplofizicheskie aspekty obshchey gazovoy krioterapii. Vesti NAN Belarusi. Ser. fiz.-tekhn. nauk. 2011;3:59–71. [Makhanyok A.A., Levin M.L., Dragun V.L. Thermophysigal aspects of gas cryotherapy. News of the National Academy of Sciences of Belarus, Physico-Technical Series. 2011;3:59–71. (In Russ.)]
13. Baranov A.Yu., Malysheva T.A., Savelyeva A.V., Sidorova A.Yu. Vybor skhemy obshchego krioterapevticheskogo vozdeystviya. Vestnik Mezhdunarodnoy Akademii Kholoda. 2012;4:40-44. [Baranov A.Yu., Malysheva T.A., Savelyeva A.V., Sidorova A.Yu. Selecting the general scheme of cryotherapeutic action. Journal of IAR. 2012;4:40-44. (In Russ.)]
14. Baranov A.Yu., Malysheva T.A., Savelyeva A.V., Sidorova A.Yu. Perenos teploty v obekte obshchego krioterapevticheskogo vozdeystviya. Vestnik Mezhdunarodnoy Akademii Kholoda. 2012;2:35-40. [Baranov A.Yu., Malysheva T.A., Savelyeva A.V., Sidorova A.Yu. Heat transfer in the object of general cryotherapeutic action. Journal of IAR. 2012;2:35-40. (In Russ.)]
15. Westerlund T., Oksa J., Smolander J., Mikkelsson M. Thermal responses during and after whole-body cryotherapy. Journal of Thermal Biology. 2003. 601–608.
Review
For citations:
Baranov A.U., Osinа A.A., Sinkova V.A. ENERGY AND CONSTRUCTION CONDITIONS OF THE EFFECTIVENESS OF APPAATUS FOR GENERAL CRYOTHERAPEUTIC IMPACT. Herald of Dagestan State Technical University. Technical Sciences. 2016;43(4):25-33. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.21822/2073-6185-2016-43-4-25-33