DEVELOPMENT OF THE STATE SUPPORT FORMS PROJECTS IN INDUSTRIAL BUILDING
https://doi.org/10.21822/2073-6185-2016-42-3-220-230
Abstract
Aim. The topicality of the research is stipulated by the objective necessity of the organizational and economic mechanism improvement of the state support projects of the industrial building. The aim of the research is the development of conceptual provisions and methodological foundations of financial projects creating conditions for economic growth of Russia based on the construction and putting into effect industrial objects.
Methods. In the course of the research the system, subject-functional and structural approaches were implemented to solve the problems set widening the scope of the complex approach to assessment of the current operating mechanism of the state financial support of the projects and financial volume; to criteria stipulation of the most effective projects contest selection: to the search of the investment resources accumulation instrument into industrial building.
Results. It is stipulated that state investment policy in industrial building mechanism oriented to define rational investment volumes and their branch, reproductive, technological and territorial structure; option of the building branch development priority; increase of the investment projects efficiency realization. The dynamics of the state support in the form of subsidies and budget investments into creation of the industrial building objects is analytically summarized. It is determined that the peculiarity of the modern state support projects of industrial building is transition from budget allocations distribution between branches and regions to selective and partial financing of specific investment projects on competitive basis. Some tactics of state and private partnership attracting private capital without losing strategic state control under systems and objects are defined. As an effective form of the industrial building support projects it is proposed to use a concession model form: projecting - building- financing- ownership - exploitation.
Conclusion. The state support projects system of the industrial building provides the realization of all concerned people's economic interests at all stages of creating, realizing, crediting, contracts concluding and objects commissioning. The concession support model allows the state to get a number of advantages solving the problem of budget load reduction by attracting private capital. The state support forms development of industrial building promotes the competitive industrial base forming the prospect of the stable economic growth in Russia. The work has been done in the frameworks of the state order of the Ministry of Education and Science of the Russian Federation No. 2916 «Development of the organizational-economic mechanism of effective development of economic sectors».
About the Authors
I. M. MeilanovRussian Federation
Director of the Dagestan State Technical University in the city of Derbent,
70 I. Shamil Ave, Makhachkala, 367015
A. M. Esetova
Russian Federation
Doctor of Economics, Professor, Head of the Department of World Economy,
70 I. Shamil Ave, Makhachkala, 367015
References
1. The Budget Code of Russian Federation in 2016 (Russian edition 2016-2017 BC), Article 21, Article 79, st.78.2, Article 79. (In Russian)
2. Basic indicators of investment and construction activities in the Russian Federation in 2014. The bulletin Federal State Statistics Service, 2014. Access modehttp:www.gks.ru/bgd/regl/b14_100/Main.htm (In Russian)
3. Socio-economic situation in Russia in January-August 2016 the first-yes.Bulletin Federal State Statistics Service, 2016. Access mode http:www.gks.ru/free_doc/doc_2016. (In Russian)
4. Jalilova S. Public-Private Partnerships as an effective form of management of investment projects in building. Regional'nye problemy preobrazovanija jekonomiki [Regional problems of the economy transformation]. 2013, no.35, pp.170-175. (In Russian)
5. Niyazmetov A.K. State capital investments: problems and solutions. Finance, no. 9, September 2014. Access mode http://www.finexg.ru/(In Russian)
6. Ob otbore subektov RF, imejushhih pravo na poluchenie gospodderzhki v forme subsidij na vozmeshhenie zatrat na sozdanie infrastruktury industrial'nyh parkov i tehnoparkov. Postanovlenie Pravitel'stva RF [On the selection of subjects of the Russian Federation, entitled to receive state support in the form of subsidies for reimbursement of the cost of building infrastructure of industrial parks and industrial parks]. RF Government Resolution, October 30, 2014, no. 1119. (In Russian)
7. Pravila osushhestvlenija kapital'nyh vlozhenij v obekty gosudarstvennoj sobstvennosti Rossijskoj Federacii za schet sredstv federal'nogo bjudzheta. Postanovlenie Pravitel'stva RF [Terms of the capital investment in state property objects of liability of the Russian Federation at the expense of the federal budget]. RF Government Resolution September 1, 2014, no.13. (In Russian)
8. Razzhivina D.O., Bovin A.A. Some issues of improving the budget process. Sibirskaja finansovaja shkola [Siberian financial school]. 2011, no.2, рр.8-12. (In Russian)
9. The statistical book "Russia in Figures 2015", Federal State Statistics Service, 2015. Access mode http://www.gks.ru/free_doc/doc_2015/rusfig/rus-15.pdf. (In Russian)
10. Siberian Academy. Actual construction problems. [Electronic resource]. URL: http:sibac.info/index.php. (In Russian)
11. http: RBK.Issledovaniya markets. marketing.rbc.ru/news_research. (In Russian)
12. Fedotovsky A.Y. Development of a method of valuation of economic efficiency of the innovative project management in the construction industry. Problemy sovremennoj jekonomiki [Problems of modern economy]. 2009, no.1, p.5. (In Russian)
13. On Concession Agreements. The Federal Law "Adopted Gos.Dumu 21.07. 2005, no. 11. (In Russian)
14. Cervantes M., Meissner D. Commercialising Public Research under the Open Innovation Model: New Trends. Foresight-Russia, 2014, vol. 8, no. 3, pp. 70–81.
15. Dahlgren E, Leung T. An optimal multiple stopping approach to infrastructure investment decisions. Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control. 2015; 53:251−267.
16. Greenspan A. Structural changes in the economy and financial markets. Vital Speeches of the Day. 2000; 5(67):130–134.
17. Halawa W., Abdelalim A., Elrashed I. Financial evaluation program for construction projects at the pre-investment phase in developing countries: A case study. International Journal of Project Management. 2013; 31(6):912−923.
18. Linton J., Vonortas N. From Research Project to Research Portfolio: Meeting Scale and Complexity. Foresight-Russia, 2015, vol. 9, no 2, pp. 38–43. DOI: 10.17323/1995-459x.2015.2.38.43
19. Towler G, Sinnott R. Economic Evaluation of Projects. Chemical Engineering Design. 2013; 2:389−429.
20. Wren C, Taylor J. Industrial restructuring and regional policy. Oxford Economic Papers. 1999; 51(3):487–516.
Review
For citations:
Meilanov I.M., Esetova A.M. DEVELOPMENT OF THE STATE SUPPORT FORMS PROJECTS IN INDUSTRIAL BUILDING. Herald of Dagestan State Technical University. Technical Sciences. 2016;42(3):220-230. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.21822/2073-6185-2016-42-3-220-230