GEODETIC POINTS COORDINATES TRANSITION SIMULATION FROM THE ELLIPSOID SURFACE INTO THE SPACE CONFORMAL GAUSS-KRUGER PROJECTION
https://doi.org/10.21822/2073-6185-2016-42-3-110-118
Abstract
Aim. In this paper we calculated the abscissa dynamics and ordinate of differences in latitude and analysis geodetic points coordinates in the ellipsoid coordinates into the conformal Gauss-Kruger projection. It is described the classical formula of conformal projection.
Methods. Coordinate transition from one system to another in geodesy is the most urgent task that we faces to every day. Currently, especially the use of satellite positioning systems, the measured values (pseudo) are converted into coordinates of positioning points of rectangular geocentric coordinate system X, Y, Z. Next, the points coordinates from this system are converted to geodetic coordinate system to a particular model of the ellipsoid B, L and H, then they are transferred to a flat, rectangular coordinate system x, y. Below are the classic formula and transition method from geodetic coordinate system to a space rectangular zonal system in conformal Gauss-Kruger projection are given.
Results. In order visualization of the translation coordinate computation results are given graphically according to latitude one degree. From given calculation that the difference between the x-points have a linear positive trend on the mid-latitudes and the positive and negative non-linear dynamics of the equator to the pole, respectively. The linearity of the negative dynamics of the ordinate differences from the equator to middle latitudes and on the northern latitudes, these differences have a nonlinear negative.
Conclusion. It is found that only a rectangular coordinate on the plane, being well isometric create a network of equal squares.
About the Authors
S. N. MamedbekovRussian Federation
senior lecturer, Department of descriptive geometry, computer graphics and geodesy,
70 I. Shamil Ave, Makhachkala, 367015
A. O. Omarov
Russian Federation
PhD in economic Sciences, Associate Professor, Department of construction materials and engineering networks,
70 I. Shamil Ave, Makhachkala, 367015
R. G. Radjabov
Russian Federation
Assistant Professor of Department of descriptive geometry, computer graphics and geodesy,
70 I. Shamil Ave, Makhachkala, 367015
References
1. Gauss K.F. Selected geodetic works. T. II, Higher Geodesy. Edited and with an introduction by G. V. Bagratuni. Moscow: Geodezizdat, 1958, pp.149-154.
2. Sunsets PS higher geodesy course. Moscow: Nedra, 1976, pp.173 - 177. (In Russian)
3. Bagratuni G.V. Course spheroidal geodesy. Moscow: Geodezizdat, 1962 - p. 173 - 180. (In Russian)
4. Bagratuni G.V. New formulas output method to transform geodetic in rectangular coordinates and vice versa. Moscow: Geodezizdat, 1953, Proceedings MIIGAiK, vol.15, pp. 3-9. (In Russian)
5. Voroshilov A.P. Satellite systems and total stations to ensure construction work. Chelyabinsk, Aksvell. 2007, pp.188 - 202. (In Russian)
6. Morozov V.P. Course spheroidal geodesy. Moscow: Nedra, 1979, pp.144 - 147. (In Russian) 7. Yakovlev N.V. Higher Geodesy. Moscow: Nedra, 1989, pp. 254 - 258. (In Russian)
7. Teleganov N.A., Teterin G.N. The method and system of coordinates in geodesy. Moscow: Geodezizdat. 2008, p.109. (In Russian)
8. HeiskanenW.A., Moritz H., Phisical geodesi, Freeman W.H. and Co., Sanfrancisko, London, 1966, p. 224.
9. Smitsonian Standard Earth III, ed. by Gaposhkin E.M., SAO, Cambridge, 1973, pp. 88 – 91.
10. Mamedbekov S.N. Priori estimate of the accuracy of determining geodetic unknown Doppler methods. Izvestija vuzov. Geodesy and aerial. 1981, no.3, pp.18-22. (In Russian)
11. Mamedbekov S.N. Using the radial velocity for the implementation of the HIS orbital method of space geodesy. Izvestija vuzov. Geodesy and aerial photography. Moscow.1982, no.4, pp.12 - 16. (In Russian)
12. Genik A.A., G.G. Pobedinsky Global satellite system definitionlocation and their use in geodesy. Moscow: Kartgeocentr, 2004, 355 p.
13. Genik A.A. Criteria for evaluation of accuracy when satellite coordinate definitions. Izvestija vuzov. Geodesy and aerial photography. Moscow. 2009, no.6, pp. 6 - 11.
14. Kupriyanov S.A. Local transformation of coordinate systems implemented in software packages for the processing of satellite measurements. Izvestija vuzov. Geodesy and aerial photography. Moscow. 2012, no.3, pp. 3 - 8. (In Russian)
15. Uniform state system of geodetic coordinates 1995. Directory. Moscow: CNIIGAiK, 2000. (In Russian)
Review
For citations:
Mamedbekov S.N., Omarov A.O., Radjabov R.G. GEODETIC POINTS COORDINATES TRANSITION SIMULATION FROM THE ELLIPSOID SURFACE INTO THE SPACE CONFORMAL GAUSS-KRUGER PROJECTION. Herald of Dagestan State Technical University. Technical Sciences. 2016;42(3):110-118. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.21822/2073-6185-2016-42-3-110-118