Energy Performance study of a Cooling supply system with an Lithium bromide absorption chillers using Geothermal heat
https://doi.org/10.21822/2073-6185-2026-53-2-6-13
Abstract
Objective. The aim of the study is to determine the boundary conditions for the efficient operation of a lithium bromide absorption refrigeration machine operating on geothermal water.
Method. The study is based on thermodynamic analysis methods.
Result. A mathematical model based on mass and energy conservation laws for the generator, condenser, evaporator, absorber, and solution heat exchanger is developed. The simulation covers geothermal water inlet temperatures from 70 to 110°C, with constant cooling water and chilled water parameters. The study investigates the impact of the heat source temperature on the generator load, cooling capacity, and the coefficient of performance (COP). The results indicate that raising the driving temperature from 70 to 110°C improves the COP from 0.52 to 0.81. A sharp decline in performance is observed below 75°C due to poor vapor generation conditions. Optimal flow rate ratios between the geothermal fluid and the chilled water are identified to maximize cooling output. Incorporating a solution heat exchanger enhances the COP by 40-45% compared to a basic cycle.
Conclusion. The findings provide practical guidance for designing efficient geothermal cooling systems and selecting appropriate operational strategies.
About the Author
I. A. ZaitsevRussian Federation
Ivan A. Zaitsev, Postgraduate Student, Educational center "Energy efficient engineering systems"
49 Kronverksky Ave., St. Petersburg 197101
References
1. El Haj Assad M. Geothermal absorption cooling systems: a 2025 perspective / M. El Haj Assad, M. Sadeghzadeh, M.H. Ahmadi, R. Kumar. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews. 2025;189:113912.
2. Lund J.W. Direct utilization of geothermal energy 2025 worldwide review / J.W. Lund, A.N. Toth. Geothermics. 2026; 115:102–121.
3. Eveloy V. Sustainable district cooling systems: status, challenges, and future opportunities / V. Eveloy, D.S. Ayou. Journal of Cleaner Production. 2023;389:135983.
4. Akhoundi M. Comparison of two novel geothermal-powered cooling systems based on 4E evaluations / M. Akhoundi, M. Deymi-Dashtebayaz, M. Asadi, E. Amiri Rad. Clean Technologies and Environmental Policy. 2024; 26:1-18.
5. Alrobaian A.A. Energy, exergy, economy, and environmental (4E) analysis of a multi-generation system composed of solar-assisted Brayton cycle, Kalina cycle, and absorption chiller. Applied Thermal Engineering. 2022; 204: 117988.
6. Asadi M. Comparing the profitability of waste heat electricity generation of internal combustion engines: An exergoeconomic analysis / M. Asadi, M. Deymi-Dashtebayaz, E. Amiri Rad. Applied Thermal Engineering. 2022; 211:118443.
7. Caliskan H. Advanced, extended and combined extended-advanced exergy analyses of a novel geothermal powered combined cooling, heating and power system / H. Caliskan, E. Açıkkalp, H. Rostamnejad Takleh, V. Zare. Renewable Energy. 2023; 206:125-134.
8. Nikbakhti R. Absorption cooling systems – Review of various techniques for energy performance enhancement / R. Nikbakhti, X. Wang, A.K. Hussein, A. Iranmanesh. Alexandria Engineering Journal. 2022; 61( 2):1567-1592.
9. Kini P.G. Performance enhancement of single stage LiBr-H₂O absorption chiller using advanced cycle configurations / P.G. Kini, S. Kumar, N. Sharma. Energy Reports. 2022; 8:1325-1335.
10. Matak N. Integration of waste-to-energy plant in district heating and cooling systems under changing energy markets / N. Matak, T. Novosel, G. Krajačić. Energy. 2022; 239: 122–136.
11. Dominković D.F. A review of district cooling technology and applications: 2022 update / D.F. Dominković, K.A. Kazagić, T. Pukšec. Energy. 2022; 252:124–139.
12. Azariyan H. Assessment of a high-performance geothermal-based multigeneration system for production of power, cooling, and hydrogen / H. Azariyan, M. Vajdi, H. Rostamnejad Takleh. Energy Conversion and Management. 2022; 268:116012.
13. Caglayan H. Advanced exergy analyses and optimization of a cogeneration system for ceramic industry / H. Caglayan, H. Caliskan. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews. 2022; 155: 111928.
14. Chen P. Conventional and advanced exergy analysis of an air-cooled type of absorption-ejection refrigeration cycle with R290-mineral oil as the working pair / P. Chen, G. He, Y. Gao. Energy Conversion and Management. 2022; 252:15112.
15. Ambriz-Díaz V.M. Advanced exergy and exergoeconomic analysis for a polygeneration plant operating in geothermal cascade /V.M. Ambriz-Díaz, C. Rubio-Maya, E. Ruiz-Casanova. Energy Conversion and Management. 2022; 267:115894.
16. Al-Hamed K.H.M. Investigation of a concentrated solar-geothermal integrated system with a combined ejector-absorption refrigeration cycle for a small community / K.H.M. Al-Hamed, I. Dincer. International Journal of Refrigeration. 2022; 136: 112-125.
17. Ahmadi Boyaghchi F. Exergoeconomic analysis and optimization of a solar driven dual-evaporator vapor compression-absorption cascade refrigeration system using water/CuO nanofluid / F. Ahmadi Boyaghchi, M. Mahmoodnezhad, V. Sabeti. Journal of Cleaner Production. 2022; 330:129876.
18. Assad M.E.H. Space cooling using geothermal single-effect water/lithium bromide absorption chiller / M.E.H. Assad, M. Sadeghzadeh, M.H. Ahmadi. Energy Science & Engineering. 2022;10(8): 2745-2760.
19. Balboa-Fernández M. District heating and cooling systems in Spain: 2023 update / M. Balboa-Fernández, J.A. Carta, R. Cabrera. Energy Reports. 2023; 9:1245-1258.
20. District Cooling Handbook 2025. – Brussels: Euroheat & Power, 2025;182.
21. ASHRAE Handbook – HVAC Applications. – Atlanta: ASHRAE, 2024; 1150.
22. Horuz I. A comparison between ammonia-water and water-lithium bromide solutions in vapor absorption refrigeration systems: modern perspective / I. Horuz, M. Kilic. International Communications in Heat and Mass Transfer. 2023;142: 106632.
23. Dincer I. Geothermal energy systems for cooling: 2024 review /I. Dincer, H. Al-Hamed. Energy. 2024; 298:131234.
24. Wang X. Advanced absorption cooling technologies: a 2025 review /X. Wang, R. Nikbakhti, A.K. Hussein. Alexandria Engineering Journal. 2025; 9:45-67.
25. Zare V. Thermoeconomic optimization of geothermal absorption chillers /V. Zare, H. Rostamnejad Takleh. Energy Conversion and Management. 2024;301:118045.
Review
For citations:
Zaitsev I.A. Energy Performance study of a Cooling supply system with an Lithium bromide absorption chillers using Geothermal heat. Herald of Dagestan State Technical University. Technical Sciences. 2026;53(2):6-13. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.21822/2073-6185-2026-53-2-6-13
JATS XML































