On the hypothesis of the equation for technical system state
https://doi.org/10.21822/2073-6185-2024-51-4-112-122
Abstract
Objective. The objective of the study is to formulate and demonstrate potential additional expert capabilities and a hypothesis to improve the quality of technical system projects by combining the analysis of technical characteristics of the project and human factor influence parameters. Method. The paper considers obtaining invariant relationships for some characteristics of technical systems, on the basis of which a hypothesis of the equation of state of a technical system is formulated. Result. Auxiliary analytical approaches have been developed to compare individual operational parameters of projects, conduct an expert assessment of technical systems of projects, devices and technologies. The use of the hypothesis of the equation of state of a technical system allows for expert assessments of the safety of a technical system. Conclusion. The use of additional expert approaches and hypotheses allows for the accumulation of experience in expert assessments, correlation analysis of data, determination of potential capabilities in the context of further modifications and upgrades of technical systems of the project, development of improved operational forecasts and strategies, and adoption of adequate management decisions.
About the Author
D. J. Lobach
Department on nuclear and radiation safety of Ministry on emergency situations of the Republic of Belarus
Belarus
Belarus
Dmitry J. Lobach, Cand. Sci. (Eng), Retired Civil Servant
ResearcherID: HKN-7220-2023
16 Bersona Str. Minsk 220030
References
1. Safety assessment for facilities and activities. General safety requirements. International Atomic Energy Agency. IAEA safety standards series, GSR Part4 (Rev.1).Vienna:International Atomic Energy Agency; 2016.
2. Safety of nuclear power plants : design. Specific safety requirements. International Atomic Energy Agency. IAEA safety standards series, no. SSR-2/1 (Rev. 1) . Vienna: International Atomic Energy Agency; 2016.
3. SPESS F Document Preparation Profile (DPP) Version 4 dated 06 October 2022. DS537. Safety demonstration of innovative technology in power reactor designs [Electronic resource]. International Atomic Energy Agency, 2022. https://www.iaea.org/sites/default/files/dpp537.pdf
4. Norenkov I.P., Harutyunyan N.M. Evolutionary methods in the problems of choosing design solutions. Mechanical engineering and computer technology, september 2007 [Electronic resource]. https://cyberleninka.ru/journal/n/mashinostroenie-i-kompyuternye-tehnologii?i=854303 (In Russ.)
5. Bochkov A.V. On the methods of qualitative estimation of the safety state of structurally complex systems. Dependability. 2020; 20(3): 34-46. https://doi.org/10.21683/1729-2646-2020-20-3-34-46 (In Russ.)
6. Bochkov A.V. On the method of risk synthesis in the safety management of structurally complex systems. Dependability. 2020; 20(1): 57-67. https://doi.org/10.21683/1729-2646-2020-20-1-57-67 (In Russ.)
7. Gàzizov T.T. Global optimization method classification on security problems solution. Proceedings of Tomsk State University of Control Systems and Radioelectronics. 2008; 2(18): 130-131. (In Russ.)
8. Lobach D.J. New problems, methodology and possibilities of Safeometrics . Promyšlennaâ bezopasnostʹ. 2023; 01: 34-36. ISSN 2958-4523. (In Russ.)
9. Lobach D.J. About development of expert possibilities for consideration of equipment projects and technological decisions . System analysis and applied information science. 2023; 02: 38-41. https://doi.org/10.21122/2309-4923-2023-2-38-41 (In Russ.)
10. Lobach D.J. On the development of approaches to system safety assessment in the design of technical systems. Ontology of designing. 2023; 13(4): 615-624. https://doi.org/10.18287/2223-9537-2023-13-4-615-624. (In Russ.)
11. Kovalev M. M. Education for the Digital Economy. Digital transformation. 2018; 1(2): 37–42. (In Russ.)
12. The human factor and the safety of nuclear installations. Materials of the International conference MK2000 . Moscow, Obninsk : ONITS "Forecast"; 2001. (In Russ.)
13. Abramova V.N. Organizational psychology, organizational culture and safety culture in atomic energy . Moscow, Obninsk : IG – SOCIN; 2009. (In Russ.)
14. Safety culture, Safety series, No.75-INSAG-4, a report by the International Nuclear Safety Advisory Group. Vienna: International Atomic Energy Agency; 1991.
15. Examples of safety culture practices, Safety reports series, No.1. Vienna: International Atomic Energy Agency; 1997.
16. Key practical issues in strengthening safety culture, Safety series, No.INSAG-15, a report by the International Nuclear Safety Advisory Group. Vienna: International Atomic Energy Agency; 2002.
17. Hudson D.J. Statistics. Lectures on Elementary Statistics and Probability, Geneva, 1964 (In Russ.).
18. Taylor J. Introduction to the theory of errors. M.; 1985. (In Russ.)
19. Kolde Ya.K. Practicum on probability theory and mathematical statistics. M.; 1991. (In Russ.)
Review
For citations:
Lobach D.J. On the hypothesis of the equation for technical system state. Herald of Dagestan State Technical University. Technical Sciences. 2024;51(4):112-122. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.21822/2073-6185-2024-51-4-112-122
Views:
402
Email this article 
