About the Assessment of Group aspects of the Human factor influence on Safety of Technical systems
https://doi.org/10.21822/2073-6185-2024-51-1-132-141
Abstract
Objective. The purpose of theoretical research is the need to formulate and describe additional approaches and topical issues and tasks when conducting an expert assessment of group (collective) aspects of the human factor's influence on the safety of technical systems.
Method. The paper considers the methodology of assessment based on the use of the Gauss distribution for the statistical description of cases of the influence of the human factor on safety, shows the relationship between individual and group aspects.
Result. Examples are given and explanations are given for the application of a quantitative assessment of the influence of the human factor on the safety of technical systems, taking into account the consideration of safety culture, different levels of professionalism of employees, organizational measures taken, the possibilities of the method and its potential tasks are formulated.
Conclusion. The use of statistical distributions to describe the impact of the human factor on safety makes it possible to combine and describe the relationship between individual and group aspects of the phenomenon. This allows the expert to carry out quantitative assessments, modeling and make predictions on the level of safety culture in the organization and the effectiveness of production management or technical systems.
About the Author
D. I. Lobach
Department on Nuclear and Radiation Safety of Ministry on Emergency Situations of the Republic of Belarus
Belarus
Belarus
Dmitry I. Lobach, Cand. Sci. (Eng), Retired civil servant
ResearcherID: HKN-7220-2023
16 Bersona St., Minsk 220030, Belarus
References
1. The human factor and the safety of nuclear installations. Materials of the International conference MK-2000. Moscow, Obninsk : ONITS "Forecast"; 2001. (In Russ.).
2. Safety culture, Safety series, No.75-INSAG-4, a report by the International Nuclear Safety Advisory Group. Vienna: International Atomic Energy Agency; 1991.
3. Key practical issues in strengthening safety culture, Safety series, No.INSAG-15, a report by the International Nuclear Safety Advisory Group. Vienna: International Atomic Energy Agency; 2002.
4. Examples of safety culture practices, Safety reports series, No.1. Vienna: International Atomic Energy Agency; 1997.
5. Abramova V.N. Organizational psychology, organizational culture and safety culture in atomic energy. Moscow, Obninsk : IG – SOCIN; 2009. (In Russ.)
6. Self-assessment of safety culture in nuclear installations. Highlights and good practices, IAEA-TECDOC-1321. Vienna: International Atomic Energy Agency; 2002.
7. Performing safety culture self-assessments, Safety reports series,. Vienna: International Atomic Energy Agency; 2016; 83.
8. Lobach D.J. New problems, methodology and possibilities of Safeometrics. Promyšlennaâ bezopasnostʹ. 2023; 01: 34-36. ISSN 2958-4523. (In Russ.)
9. Lobach D.J. About development of expert possibilities for consideration of equipment projects and technological decisions. System analysis and applied information science. 2023; 02: 38-41. https://doi.org/10.21122/2309-4923-2023-2-38-41 (In Russ.)
10. Hudson D.J. Statistics. Lectures on Elementary Statistics and Probability, Geneva, 1964, D. Hudson, Statistics for physicists. Lectures on Probability Theory and Elementary Statistics. Moscow:Mir. 1970.
11. Taylor J. Introduction to the theory of errors. M.; 1985. (In Russ.)
12. Kolde Ya.K. Practicum on probability theory and mathematical statistics. M.; 1991. (In Russ.)
13. Kovalev, M. M. Education for the Digital Economy. Digital transformation. 2018; 01(2): 37–42. (In Russ.)
Review
For citations:
Lobach D.I. About the Assessment of Group aspects of the Human factor influence on Safety of Technical systems. Herald of Dagestan State Technical University. Technical Sciences. 2024;51(1):132-141. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.21822/2073-6185-2024-51-1-132-141
Views:
1303
Email this article 
