Express - a method of forming a representative expert coalition based on an extended correlation matrix
https://doi.org/10.21822/2073-6185-2023-50-3-83-91
Abstract
Objective. The aim of the study is to develop an effective express method for the formation of a representative expert coalition based on the analysis of correlations between expert opinions.
Method. It is proposed to use an extended correlation matrix, which takes into account not only the strength of the correlation between the experts’ ratings, but also the average value of the ratings for the entire set of highly qualified specialists. This matrix will take into account the diversity of opinions and preferences of highly qualified specialists, as well as provide a high degree of representativeness in making collective decisions.
Result. Verification of the obtained results was carried out on the example of polls of police officers in relation to violators of security systems. A significant number of various calculations determines the implementation of the developed numerical method using a computer. This express method is a useful tool for the rapid and efficient formation of representative expert coalitions and decision-making based on the opinions of a large number of highly qualified specialists.
Conclusion. The proposed method can be applied in various scientific and technical fields, such as expert systems, multi-criteria decision making, risk assessment, and other situations where it is necessary to combine the opinions of a large number of experts.
About the Author
R. A. ZhilinRussian Federation
Roman A. Zhilin, Cand. Sci. (Eng.), Senior lecturer,
53 Patriotov St., Voronezh 394065
References
1. Zagorskaya A. V., Lapidus A. A. Application of peer review methods in scientific research. Required number of experts. Construction production, (2020); (3): 21-34. (In Russ)
2. Duda R.O. Expert Systems Research. Science, (1983); (220(4594)): 261-8.
3. Haocheng. T. A brief history and technical review of the expert system research. IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering, 2017; 242: 012111.
4. Ruposov VL Methods for determining the number of experts. iPolytech Journal, 2015; 3 (98): 286-292. (In Russ)
5. Oravec J. A. Expert Systems and Knowledge-based Engineering (1984-1991). International Journal of Designs for Learning, 2014; 7.
6. Avolio G., Radu A., Kazarov A., Miotto G., Magnoni L. Applications of advanced data analysis and expert system technologies in the ATLAS Trigger-DAQ Controls framework. Journal of Physics Conference Series, (2012); (396): 2003.10.1088/1742-6596/396/1/012003.
7. Postnikov V. M. Analysis of approaches to the formation of the composition of an expert group focused on preparation and decision making. Mechanical engineering and computer technologies, 2012;05: 23. (In Russ)
8. Moore R.L. Expert Systems in Process Control: Applications Experience. In: Sriram, D., Adey, R. (eds) Applications of Artificial Intelligence in Engineering Problems. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. 1986.
9. A.V. Startsev, Models for the coordination of expert assessments in group selection procedures: dis ..... cand. tech. Sciences: 05.13.01. Voronezh; 2004.
10. Angeli, C. Diagnostic Expert Systems: From Expert’s Knowledge to Real-Time Systems. Advanced Knowledge Based Systems: Model, Applications & Research, 2010; 1.
11. Mingers J. Expert Systems—Experiments with Rule Induction [Internet]. Journal of the Operational Research Society 1987; 38:39-47.
12. Bramer M. A. A Survey and Critical Review of Expert Systems. London, New York: Gordon and Breach; 1982.
13. Melnikov A.V., Shcherbakova I.V., Zhilin R.A. The method of forming coalitions of experts within the framework of solving the problem of examining alternatives with weakly formalizable criteria. Actual problems of applied mathematics, informatics and mechanics. Proceedings of the International Scientific Conference. 2020;968–75.
14. Akhlyustin S.B., Melnikov A.V., & Zhilin R.A. Prediction of the integrated indicator of quality of a new object under the conditions of multicollinearity of reference data. Bulletin of the South Ural State University. Series: Mathematical modeling and programming. 2020; 13(4):66-80.
15. Melnikov A. V., Shcherbakova I. V., Zhilin R. A. Method of forming expert coalitions in the context of solving the expertise problem of alternatives with weakly formalized criteria. J. Phys.: Conf. Ser. 2020 1479012071.
16. Konobeevsky, V.V. Statistical methods of expert systems for assessing the quality of radio engineering devices of the penitentiary system: dis ..... cand. tech. Sciences: 05.13.18. Voronezh, 2006. (In Russ)
17. Navoev V.V. Expert-statistical method for assessing the characteristics of information-measuring systems: thesis.....cand. tech. Sciences: 05.13.18. Voronezh, 2003. (In Russ)
18. Kiryukhin S. M., Plekhanova S. V. Expert methods in assessing the quality of fabrics. Design and Technology.2019;(71(113): 63-70. (In Russ)
19. Zhilin R.A., Shcherbakova I.V. To the question of the classification of violators of the security of protected objects. Security, safety, communications, 2019;(4-2(4): 115-120. (In Russ)
20. Zhilin R.A. Features of using the program for the formation of highly coordinated groups of experts based on the numerical method of preliminary examination. Bulletin of the Voronezh Institute of the Federal Penitentiary Service of Russia, 2022; 1: 40–45. (In Russ)
21. Zhilin R.A., Melnikov A.V., Shcherbakova I.V. Numerical method for assessing the need to use alternative coalitions in the analysis of integral indicators of the danger of violators in the field of physical protection. Bulletin of the Voronezh Institute of the Federal Penitentiary Service of Russia, 2020; 3: 45–52. (In Russ)
Review
For citations:
Zhilin R.A. Express - a method of forming a representative expert coalition based on an extended correlation matrix. Herald of Dagestan State Technical University. Technical Sciences. 2023;50(3):83-91. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.21822/2073-6185-2023-50-3-83-91